Bull Mar Sci 61(1):111–128īrown CJ, Smith SJ, Lawton P, Anderson JT (2011) Benthic habitat mapping: a review of progress towards improved understanding of the spatial ecology of the seafloor using acoustic techniques. Aquaculture 282:63–69īooth JD (1997) Long-distance movements in Jasus spp. Parks Victoria, Melbourneīermudes M, Ritar A (2008) Response of early stage spiny lobster Jasus edwardsii phyllosoma larvae to changes in temperature and photoperiod. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 370:104–119īarton J, Pope A, Howe S (2012) Marine natural values study Vol 2: Marine Protected Areas of the Central Victoria Bioregion. Mar Freshw Res 60:417–425īarrett NS, Buxton CD, Edgar GJ (2009b) Changes in invertebrate and macroalgal populations in Tasmanian marine reserves in the decade following protection. Veg Res 69:35–45īarrett N, Buxton C, Gardner C (2009a) Rock lobster movement patterns and population structure within a Tasmanian marine protected area inform fishery and conservation management. Ecol Appl 8(1):S79–S92Īustin M (1987) Models for the analysis of species’ response to environmental gradients. Mar Policy 35:226–232Īllison GW, Lubchenco J, Carr MH (1998) Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. IUCN, GlandĪgardy T, Di sciara GN, Christie P (2011) Mind the gap: addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning. A marine conservation and development report. Biol Conserv 144:2739–2744Īgardy TE (1994) The science of conservation in the coastal zone: new insight on how to design, implement, and monitor marine protected areas. Ecol Appl 15:1798–1812Īfonso P, Fontes J, Santos RS (2011) Small marine reserves can offer long term protection to an endangered fish. We also highlight some of the limitations in sampling design and data availability common in MPA studies and resulting implications for assessment.Ībesamis RA, Russ GR (2005) Density-dependent spillover from a marine reserve: long-term evidence. We demonstrate a methodological approach to provide a baseline data set to assess MPA effectiveness through time and measure how habitat may respond to indirect consequences of fishing or other human impacts at the species or ecosystem level. The GLMs revealed that there was still a significant difference in populations inside the reserve despite habitat differences inside and outside the reserve. Then, using generalised linear models (GLMs), we assessed differences in populations while accounting for habitat. To account for possible differences in habitat, we collected multibeam bathymetry data to allow us to characterise seafloor structure and video data to assign each sampling location to a biotope class based on macroalgae assemblages. However, many assessments of MPA effectiveness are confounded by differences in habitat. The population characteristics of the captured individuals were compared inside and outside the reserve using t tests (male size, female size, number of reproductive females, number of individuals and biomass), and we found that there were significantly greater numbers and larger individuals and biomass inside the reserve. edwardsii populations inside a reserve and an adjacent area outside the reserve. We used standardised fishery assessment trapping methods to sample J. In this study, we assess a localised population of the ecologically and economically important southern rock lobster ( Jasus edwardsii) inside and outside a small reserve. Based on the theory of island biogeography, larger reserves are likely to protect more species and individuals but smaller reserves have been shown to positively influence populations. Where to place marine protected areas (MPAs) and how much area they should cover are some of the most basic questions when designing MPAs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |